Federal Judge to Block Trump Effort to End Protections for Family Members of US Citizens and Green Card Holders
A US District Judge, Indira Talwani, has announced plans to temporarily block the Trump administration's effort to end a program that provides temporary legal protections to over 10,000 family members of US citizens and green card holders. The ruling comes just days after another judge cleared the way for hundreds of people from South Sudan to live and work in the United States legally.
The Family Reunification Parole (FRP) program impacts individuals from seven countries: Colombia, Cuba, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, and Honduras. Most of them are set to lose their legal protections by January 14, following the Department of Homeland Security's decision to terminate the program.
However, lawyers for the plaintiffs argued that this is an "inequitable" move, as the family members had applied for the program and were granted temporary protections to start new lives in the US. They pointed out that these individuals have already obtained employment authorization documents, jobs, and enrolled their children in school.
In contrast, the government claimed that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has the authority to terminate any parole program and gave adequate notice by publishing the termination in the federal registry. The government also argued that resources would be better spent on other immigration programs due to national security concerns, as the individuals had not been thoroughly vetted.
Despite this, Judge Talwani expressed concern over the government's handling of the situation, stating that she wants to see a written notice β either a letter or email β being sent out to alert people about the program's termination. She acknowledged that the government can end the program but took issue with the way it was done.
This decision comes after lower courts largely supported maintaining temporary protections for many groups. However, in May, the Supreme Court cleared the way for the Trump administration to strip temporary legal protections from hundreds of thousands of immigrants.
As a result, nearly 1 million people could be newly exposed to deportation. The court's decision did not explain its reasoning, and two justices publicly dissented. It remains to be seen how this ruling will impact the lives of the individuals affected by the FRP program.
A US District Judge, Indira Talwani, has announced plans to temporarily block the Trump administration's effort to end a program that provides temporary legal protections to over 10,000 family members of US citizens and green card holders. The ruling comes just days after another judge cleared the way for hundreds of people from South Sudan to live and work in the United States legally.
The Family Reunification Parole (FRP) program impacts individuals from seven countries: Colombia, Cuba, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, and Honduras. Most of them are set to lose their legal protections by January 14, following the Department of Homeland Security's decision to terminate the program.
However, lawyers for the plaintiffs argued that this is an "inequitable" move, as the family members had applied for the program and were granted temporary protections to start new lives in the US. They pointed out that these individuals have already obtained employment authorization documents, jobs, and enrolled their children in school.
In contrast, the government claimed that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has the authority to terminate any parole program and gave adequate notice by publishing the termination in the federal registry. The government also argued that resources would be better spent on other immigration programs due to national security concerns, as the individuals had not been thoroughly vetted.
Despite this, Judge Talwani expressed concern over the government's handling of the situation, stating that she wants to see a written notice β either a letter or email β being sent out to alert people about the program's termination. She acknowledged that the government can end the program but took issue with the way it was done.
This decision comes after lower courts largely supported maintaining temporary protections for many groups. However, in May, the Supreme Court cleared the way for the Trump administration to strip temporary legal protections from hundreds of thousands of immigrants.
As a result, nearly 1 million people could be newly exposed to deportation. The court's decision did not explain its reasoning, and two justices publicly dissented. It remains to be seen how this ruling will impact the lives of the individuals affected by the FRP program.