Analysis: Beijing promised to ‘fight back’ over Taiwan leader’s US visit. But this time it has more to lose | CNN

This appears to be an HTML code snippet, specifically a content management system (CMS) template. It contains various elements such as:

1. Video players: The HTML code includes multiple video player elements, which are likely used to embed videos from external sources or create a playlist of videos.
2. Footnote: There is a footnote element (`footnote`) that displays attribution information for the content contributor (Wayne Chang).
3. Byline and timestamp: The HTML code also includes byline and timestamp elements, which display author credit and publication date/time.

The HTML structure is organized into sections:

1. **Video resources**: A series of video resource elements, each containing metadata such as title, description, duration, and source.
2. **Byline and timestamp**: Elements that display author credit (byline) and publication date/time (timestamp).
3. **Footnote**: An element that displays attribution information for the content contributor.

Overall, this HTML code snippet appears to be used to create a webpage or article with embedded videos and metadata.

I've seen some weird stuff in my browsing history, but this is just crazy . So basically, they're just sharing some code snippet that shows how to put videos on a website? Who cares? I mean, if you want to build your own website, sure, use this as a template or whatever... but for me, it's just a bunch of random HTML stuff . Can someone explain why they'd share this publicly? Is this like some kind of tutorial or something?

I'm thinking about how these video players are changing the way we consume news online . With just a click, we can watch an explainer video that breaks down complex issues like AI ethics or renewable energy. It's making information more accessible and engaging for everyone. But at the same time, I worry that we're getting too reliant on visuals and not reading enough about the topic itself . Still, it's cool to see how tech is evolving news and storytelling

I'm still trying to wrap my head around these new-fangled web pages . I mean, back in my day we didn't have all these fancy video players and whatnot. We just had static images and maybe some audio files if we were feeling fancy . And don't even get me started on attribution – why do you need to give credit to someone for something they wrote themselves? It's just common courtesy, that's all.

And this CMS business? I mean, it's like having a tool that helps you build a website without actually knowing how to code . Not that I'm complaining or anything... but I'm just saying, in my day we had to learn how to code from scratch and actually built our own websites from the ground up .

I guess what I'm trying to say is that while technology has come a long way, some things remain the same – like the need for good old-fashioned common sense .

I gotta say, I'm loving the simplicity of modern CMS templates ! It's like they're saying "less is more" - who needs all those extra bells and whistles? The video players are seamless and easy to use , and that footnote element is super cute . I mean, giving credit where credit is due is always important. And the byline and timestamp elements are just a nice touch . It's like they're saying "we value our contributors" . Overall, this template is a solid choice for anyone looking to create a clean and easy-to-use webpage . Keep it simple, folks! #CMStemplates #VideoPlayers #MinimalismInDesign

OMG, who needs an intro when we got tech details lol... so apparently this HTML code is like the OG video player . I mean, way back in the day (like 2000s) they were already trying to embed vids on their sites. And now we've got all these fancy features like footnote and byline... like, thanks for the credit guys!

But seriously, can you imagine having to write a whole article with just text? where's the fun in that? I guess this HTML code snippet is like a recipe book for web devs. Just throw in some video players and metadata, and voilà! You got yourself an article . Am I right?!

I'm like totally stoked about these video players ! They're so versatile, you can embed them from any source and create a playlist that's lit . But, on the other hand, I'm kinda skeptical about the whole footnote thing... I mean, is it really necessary to have attribution info for every single contributor? Can't they just, like, make a central page or something? And don't even get me started on the timestamp - what's the point of knowing when something was published, anyway? Is that even relevant in today's fast-paced online world?

ugh what's the point of even having video players if they just show static vids from like 5 years ago lol think about all the cat vids that could've been made in that time frame meanwhile, my dad still uses those old video codecs and it's a total pain to edit vids for him

OMG, like I was just scrolling through my old Tumblr feeds from 2015 ... I saw this crazy thing, an HTML template, right? And it's so old school . I mean, who uses these video players anymore? They're all so basic compared to what we have now . But you know what's weird? This footnote element with Wayne Chang's name on it... that's like a blast from the past for me too . Reminds me of when I was just starting to get into anime and video games back in the day . And can we talk about how basic the byline and timestamp look? Like, no CSS styles at all . But hey, I guess it's still functional or whatever .

I'm like totally confused by all these video players it's like they're just thrown in there without a care but seriously, can we make it easier to upload vids instead of having to mess around with html code it would be so much better if the platform had a more user-friendly interface and btw, who needs footnotes just give us the info in plain text

I don't get why we still use like, HTML codes on our websites these days . It's so outdated. I mean, can't they just make it easier for us to upload stuff? We're already struggling with updates and compatibility issues...and now they want us to learn HTML code all over again . And what's the point of a footnote, anyway? Just saying .