Man accused of 1973 slaying of Bay Area woman gets trial date

A Marin County Superior Court judge has set a trial date of April 20 for Michael Eugene Mullen, who is accused of murdering Nina Fischer in 1973. Mullen, now 77 years old, has pleaded not guilty to the charges and will face trial proceedings without bail.

In a surprising turn of events, a jury last month concluded that Mullen is mentally competent to stand trial. However, during a two-day trial, investigators revealed that they had linked Mullen to DNA evidence from the crime scene in 2021, marking a significant breakthrough in the case.

Fischer, a 31-year-old Swedish national, was found dead with gunshot wounds at her home on Point San Pedro Road in San Rafael. Her husband returned home from work and discovered her lifeless body, while their two-year-old child was left unharmed at the house.

Mullen, a former resident of Sonoma County who moved to Idaho, is expected to face trial proceedings that will examine his mental state during the time of the crime. His defense attorney, Peter Kuykendall, argued that memory can become inconsistent with age and that there was no evidence linking Mullen to the gun used in the homicide.

However, the prosecution presented a different view, with psychiatrist Dr. Salman Khan testifying that Mullen is competent to stand trial. She stated that Mullen addressed the DNA evidence found during the investigation and could potentially take breaks during the trial.

Mullen will begin his trial on April 20 at the Marin County Superior Court, where he will face charges for Fischer's murder. The case has been decades in the making, with investigators working tirelessly to link Mullen to the crime scene through DNA evidence.
 
๐Ÿ•ต๏ธโ€โ™‚๏ธ Can you believe it? It's like something out of a True Detective episode... Mullen's been living under the radar for decades and now he's being dragged back in for the murder of Nina Fischer ๐ŸŒน. 77 years old, dude, that's like watching a whole different era of music come to an end. I feel bad for his defense team trying to argue that memory can get all wonky with age, but it sounds like they're reaching ๐Ÿ˜….

The DNA evidence is like the ultimate game-changer - it's like Mullen was playing a sick video game and thought he could cover his tracks ๐ŸŽฎ. And now, here we are, 52 years later, about to find out if he's guilty or not ๐Ÿ’ฅ. It's gonna be so intense when he walks into that courtroom on April 20... will justice finally be served? Only time will tell ๐Ÿ•ฐ๏ธ
 
man i cant believe this is finally happening after all these years its like they say justice is blind but this case is a real eye opener 77 yrs old and still face trial for murder that dont sound right to me dna evidence from 2021 wow thats some crazy stuff i wonder what else they gonna come up with during the trial anyway hope they get the truth outta this
 
OMG I cant believe its finally happening ๐Ÿคฏ Mullen is gonna be tried for Nina's murder after all these years! I mean I knew DNA was gonna crack the case eventually ๐Ÿงฌ๐Ÿ’ก and now we get to see justice served on April 20 ๐ŸŽ‰. Its crazy how much time has passed since the crime happened in 1973, its like a whole different lifetime ago ๐Ÿ•ฐ๏ธ. And to think Mullen is still going strong at 77 years old ๐Ÿ˜ฒ. I hope Peter Kuykendall can prove that memory gets all messed up with age and get him off the hook ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ. But I'm not holding my breath, the DNA evidence seems pretty solid ๐Ÿ’ช. Cant wait to see how this whole trial goes down ๐Ÿ“บ
 
Ugh, I'm still trying to wrap my head around this whole trial thing. Like, what even is going on here? 77 years old and still got a date with the law? ๐Ÿคฏ And they're expecting him to remember things from like, decades ago? That's wild. And the DNA evidence just dropped out of the blue in 2021? What are the chances? ๐Ÿšจ

And can we talk about the fact that his defense attorney is trying to spin this as 'memory becomes inconsistent with age' thing? Like, okay sure, but isn't that a pretty weak argument? ๐Ÿ˜ And what's up with the prosecution saying he's competent to stand trial? That's not exactly reassuring.

I don't know, man. I just feel like we're getting a bunch of old-school justice here and it's just not sitting right with me. The whole system is just so... slow and outdated ๐Ÿ•ฐ๏ธ.
 
๐Ÿค” just thinking about this old guy going back to court after all these years is crazy... 77 and still gotta deal with the trauma of his past crimes ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ. And what's up with the DNA evidence from 2021? That's like finding a time capsule or something ๐Ÿ’ฅ. Can't help but wonder if the prosecution has really got a solid case against him or just trying to squeeze every last bit of justice outta this old man ๐Ÿ˜. And don't even get me started on the whole mental competency thing... it's like they're trying to psychoanalyze him in front of the entire courtroom ๐Ÿคฏ!
 
Man, this case is giving me so much anxiety ๐Ÿค• I'm trying to be empathetic towards Nina's family and loved ones, but it's hard not to feel like justice isn't being served yet โฐ The fact that they finally got DNA evidence linking Mullen to the crime scene after all these years is a game-changer ๐Ÿ’ก And now we're waiting for April 20th to see what happens next... I hope Mullen gets the help he needs, but at the same time, it's hard not to wonder if he'll take responsibility for his actions ๐Ÿค”
 
im so weird about this case, like, you gotta wonder what was goin on in mullens head back in 1973 ๐Ÿคฏ his defense is tryin to say that memory just kinda loses its grip with age and all, but i think it's a bit more complicated than that. like, if he's gonna deny the whole thing, why not just come clean about whatever happened? the prosecution has some solid evidence now, especially with that dna match from 2021 ๐Ÿ” it's like, impossible to fake that kinda stuff. and what really gets me is that mullen is now 77 and expectin to take on his past crimes... that's some heavy stuff for a guy that young
 
omg u can't even believe this is finally happening!! ๐Ÿคฏ after all these yrs they finally got a dna link lolol. its crazy thinkin mullen's 77 but still thought he could get away w/ murder ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ. his def atty says memory changes w age and there's no proof of him havin the gun used in the homicide, but i guess thats not gonna fly now that they have dat dna evidence ๐Ÿ’โ€โ™€๏ธ. its like, dude u cant just live ur life & get away w murder for 50 yrs without even botherin 2 check ur own DNA ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ. anywayz i'm lowkey curios what's gonna happen in trial now...
 
can't believe this guy still gets a chance to plead his case after all these years ๐Ÿคฏ 77 and they're letting him live with the thought of what he did? ๐Ÿ˜ฑ it's like the justice system is just waiting for someone to slip up so we can finally get closure, but what about Nina's family? Have they even had a say in this whole process? ๐Ÿ’” two decades plus of being stuck in limbo for Nina and her little one... this is some messed up stuff ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ
 
man... can you believe this is finally happening? 77 yrs old and still getting charged lol. the DNA evidence was a game changer, no doubt about it. but what's wild is that he pleaded not guilty from the get go. did he really think he could just live with this for so long? and now we're gonna have to see if his memory holds up in court... or if it's like his defense is saying, starts to fade away like some kind of old man's mind ๐Ÿคฏ. i wonder how much of the trial will be focused on his mental state, not just the DNA evidence ๐Ÿ’ก
 
omg, can you believe it?! this guy's been evading justice for over 50 yrs and now they finally got a hit from that dna thingy ๐Ÿคฏ i mean, mental competency is one thing but linking him to the actual gun? that's like something out of a thriller movie ๐Ÿ˜ฑ anyway, 77 yrs old and he's still trying to claim his rights...i feel bad for Nina's family and her little one who witnessed all that horror ๐Ÿ‘ถ๐Ÿ’”
 
omg, can you believe it's finally happening? after all these years, mullen is gonna have his day in court ๐Ÿคฏ he's 77 now tho, hope he's ready for that ๐Ÿ˜‚ dna evidence from 2021 was a game changer tho, no idea how they managed to link him to the crime scene back then...anyway, can't wait to see what happens at trial. hopes justice will be served ๐Ÿ’”
 
Oh my gosh ๐Ÿ’– I'm still trying to wrap my head around this whole thing! 77 years old and still standing trial? ๐Ÿคฏ That's just crazy talk ๐Ÿ˜ฒ The fact that they linked him to DNA evidence from back in 2021 is just wow ๐Ÿš€ Can you even believe it? And now he's going to have to face his past on April 20th... I'm literally shaking with anxiety ๐Ÿ’ฅ Sending all my love and positive vibes to Nina Fischer's family and loved ones โค๏ธ May justice be served โœจ
 
Wow ๐Ÿคฏ, can you believe it? A 77-year-old man is going to trial for a murder that happened over 50 years ago and now they have DNA proof linking him to the crime scene ๐Ÿ’ก. I'm thinking about how different this case would've been if we didn't have all these advancements in forensic science ๐Ÿค–. It's crazy how technology has changed everything, even old cold cases ๐Ÿ”.
 
๐Ÿค” So I was just reading about this old case and I'm like really shocked that there's still a trial happening 52 years later ๐Ÿ™ƒ. Like, can't we resolve these things sooner? I feel bad for Nina Fischer's family and her two-year-old kid who was left to deal with all this trauma over the years ๐Ÿ˜”.

And Mullen is now 77, so yeah, his memory might be a little fuzzy... but that doesn't excuse what he did ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ. The fact that they found DNA evidence linking him to the crime scene in 2021 is wild though - it's like the justice system was finally able to catch up with themselves ๐Ÿ’ช.

I'm curious to see how his defense attorney argues, though... will they try to make a case for insanity or just focus on memory and age? And what about Dr. Khan's testimony that Mullen is competent to stand trial? Is she saying he's fully in control of himself? ๐Ÿค Guess we'll have to wait and see how the trial unfolds...
 
Ugh ๐Ÿคฏ, can you believe this? Like, a guy who's almost 80 is still trying to wriggle out of responsibility for murdering someone 52 years ago? I'm all for giving people due process and all that, but come on... 77 years old and still trying to deny the truth? It's like he thinks he's some kind of ghost or something. ๐Ÿ˜‚ And now they've found DNA evidence linking him to the crime scene in 2021... what a twist! ๐Ÿ”„ I'm not saying he's definitely guilty, but it looks super suspicious right about now. We'll see how it all plays out on April 20th... fingers crossed for justice ๐Ÿ‘
 
Back
Top