Reform UK's Council Tax Betrayal: A Contradiction to Campaign Promises
Nigel Farage's Reform UK has been accused of breaking its election promises on council tax after several councils it controls announced plans for significant increases. The flagship Kent county council, controlled by the party, has proposed a 3.99% rise, significantly lower than the expected 5% increase initially anticipated.
This move comes as four other county councils – Derbyshire, North Northamptonshire, West Northamptonshire, and Leicestershire – also plan to raise council tax by 5%, the maximum allowed under law. In Kent, opposition councillors claim that Reform's decision is a betrayal of voters who were promised freeze or cut in council tax.
Reform UK's leader has defended the move, stating that it reflects progress made since taking control of the council last year. However, critics argue that this contradicts campaign promises and highlights financial mismanagement within the party. Linden Kemkaran, Kent county council leader, acknowledged the challenges faced by the council but emphasized the need to balance savings with frontline services.
Critics point out that even a reduced 3.99% increase would still result in an additional £67.47 per year for the average Band D household. Alister Brady, a Labour councillor, accused Reform of trying to deflect criticism and failing to deliver on its promises. Bill Barrett, one of the council's former Reform members turned independent, expressed concerns about services facing funding cuts.
Experts also weigh in on the matter, suggesting that even achieving a 3.99% increase may be challenging due to years of budget constraints. Tony Travers, a visiting professor at the London School of Economics, remarks that few have managed to achieve significantly lower council tax rises, which could indicate the lack of an "efficient Reform way" to balance budgets.
This latest development highlights the challenges faced by Reform UK's local government initiatives and raises questions about its ability to deliver on campaign promises.
Nigel Farage's Reform UK has been accused of breaking its election promises on council tax after several councils it controls announced plans for significant increases. The flagship Kent county council, controlled by the party, has proposed a 3.99% rise, significantly lower than the expected 5% increase initially anticipated.
This move comes as four other county councils – Derbyshire, North Northamptonshire, West Northamptonshire, and Leicestershire – also plan to raise council tax by 5%, the maximum allowed under law. In Kent, opposition councillors claim that Reform's decision is a betrayal of voters who were promised freeze or cut in council tax.
Reform UK's leader has defended the move, stating that it reflects progress made since taking control of the council last year. However, critics argue that this contradicts campaign promises and highlights financial mismanagement within the party. Linden Kemkaran, Kent county council leader, acknowledged the challenges faced by the council but emphasized the need to balance savings with frontline services.
Critics point out that even a reduced 3.99% increase would still result in an additional £67.47 per year for the average Band D household. Alister Brady, a Labour councillor, accused Reform of trying to deflect criticism and failing to deliver on its promises. Bill Barrett, one of the council's former Reform members turned independent, expressed concerns about services facing funding cuts.
Experts also weigh in on the matter, suggesting that even achieving a 3.99% increase may be challenging due to years of budget constraints. Tony Travers, a visiting professor at the London School of Economics, remarks that few have managed to achieve significantly lower council tax rises, which could indicate the lack of an "efficient Reform way" to balance budgets.
This latest development highlights the challenges faced by Reform UK's local government initiatives and raises questions about its ability to deliver on campaign promises.
. On one hand, it's clear that the party is trying to address some significant budgetary challenges they've inherited since taking control of the council last year 
. However, this move comes across as somewhat at odds with their earlier campaign promises to freeze or even cut council tax 
.
. I think it's also worth noting that this decision may be indicative of some deeper issues with how Reform UK approaches local government finances 
.
. Until then, I think voters who were expecting a freeze or cut in council tax may feel a bit disillusioned 
.
. i mean, 3.99% might seem like a drop in the bucket, but that just means they're being pretty realistic about their budget constraints 
. kent county council needs to think of ways to cut services instead of just trying to balance numbers 
.
. I mean, I was all hyped for Reform UK's council tax plans when they first came out, but it seems like they just couldn't stick to their own promises 
. A 3.99% increase might not seem like a lot, but £67.47 is still a pretty penny for the average household, you know? 
. Like, I get it, budgets are hard to balance and all that jazz, but can't we just have some semblance of honesty here? 
. They're supposed to be the champions of 'doing things differently' and all that, but it seems like they just got caught up in the same old politics 
.
.
and saw some new birdhouses installed... they were really cute, but what I found interesting was that it reminded me of how our local community garden works - volunteers come together to maintain these beautiful gardens, which provides a service for everyone in the area. Anyway, back to council tax... it's not just about the numbers, is it? It's about how we value our services and what we're willing to pay for them 
i dont know, it feels like we'll never really get to the bottom of what's going on with council tax and how reform uk is handling it. 
. It's not even close to what their opponents promised during the election campaign. And £67.47 more per year for a Band D household? That's still way too much in my opinion 
I mean, it's not like they were just going to ignore the budget constraints and promise everything but deliver nothing. That would've been pretty unrealistic (pun intended). 